> But they still lack the "alternate view" on your library. Instead ebook readers came along and reinvented filesystems, because users cannot be trusted to organize their book collection themselves. Grep and find works quite well for most work loads and are fast, why not enhance (or fork) them to support ebook formats? Though, filemanagers have started to do that to some degree. Namely, they usually don't extract data from files, like metadata, covers or previews. Filemanagers are optimized for hierachical views and don't integrate well with filetypes. Now ebook readers came along and pressed those hierarchical data flat, with long waiting times, because it needs to index first. Yes, its already there and quite organized in directories. Calibre in that regard is one of the better gardens. Calibre can export to a device, but also just a local directory. > I hate Calibre for the exact same reason. where do I find all those books when I want to copy them?). And usually with heterogeneous datas, the dynamic approach is better for consuming beacuse it allows you to break through the hierachy. The major difference is really just if you want a static and inflexible organization, or something dynamic. Those Walled Garden-Apps that work with librarys are more like a relational database, offering flexible selections and content-optimized views that filemanagers are normally lacking. Though, filemanagers have started to do that to some degree.īut they still lack the "alternate view" on your library. > powerful applications to navigate them (Total Commander / mc / Krusader). I have directories on my filesystem(s), files in those directories
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |